Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out
![veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out](https://4sysops.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Bitlocker-Active-Directory-Are-you-ready-to-encrypt-this-drive_thumb.png)
- #Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out full
- #Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out software
- #Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out password
If you choose to use the unpartitioned drive, various tools thatĮxpect to see a partitioned drive may report the entire drive as Consequently, you run the danger of some program or user accidentally deciding to format it, which will be a disaster.
#Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out software
The first problem, which always plagues a FDE drive if the encryption is done with 3rd party software like VeraCrypt, is that other software on your machine thinks that the drive is a raw unformatted drive. I initially used VeraCrypt to FDE that Sandisk SSD, because that SSD does not support encryption (unlike most Samsung SSDs), but I ran into 2 distinct problems. Unfortunately, that 2 TB WD mechanical drive needed to be replaced, and I now have a Sandisk Ultra 3D 2 TB SSD.
#Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out full
I full disk encrypted that drive with TrueCrypt. I used to have another internal drive, a 2 TB WD mechanical drive, that was for a wider range of data (e.g. (Aside: FDE on Samsung SSDs has many issues, for example, WP//civis/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1243475 or WP//questions/692172/how-do-i-encrypt-a-samsung-evo-840-ssd?rq=1.
#Veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out password
So, my BIOS prompts me to enter a password for that drive upon every boot. That drive is FDE using Samsung's built in FDE hardware. My main drive for my operating system, programs, and critical data is a Samsung 840 EVO. If you want to know more details about my particular situation, and why I am now considering encrypting only a partition instead of the full drive, read on.
![veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TN45GZ2XDx8/maxresdefault.jpg)
I also note this earlier superuser question (WP//questions/635145/possibility-of-data-loss-due-to-encryption-on-a-flash-disk) which is concerned with data loss on encrypted partitions on wear leveling drives, but that is distinct from my concern with data leakage. If the uber paranoid TAILS people are OK with encrypted partitions, that says something. I found a brief followup in this reddit discussion (WP/An indirect endorsement that encrypted partitions should be OK, even on wear leveling drives like USB flas drives, is the existence of this TAILS tutorial on creating them (WP//doc/encryption_and_privacy/encrypted_volumes/index.en.html). Saved to it will be reliably encrypted on the fly
![veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out veracrypt encrypt whole drive grayed out](https://www.wintips.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/image-89.png)
Partition/drive has been fully encrypted, any new data that will be Wear-leveling mechanisms, make sure the partition/drive does notĬontain any sensitive data before you fully encrypt it.after the If you.use in-place encryption on a drive that utilizes Tho its second paragraph backs off and notes VeraCrypt is not used to encrypt any portions of such devices or (or in file systems) that utilize a wear-leveling mechanism (and that We recommend that VeraCrypt volumes are not created/stored on devices The first paragraph of this VeraCrypt documentation page (WP//wikipage?title=Wear-Leveling) discusses wear leveling drives, and warns: with a stronger password), that is definitely a danger: the old weakly encryped data may still exist for a long time in various physical sectors. On the other had, if you re-encrypt that partition (e.g. never subsequently change its password/keyfiles(s)) then all subsequent data written to that partition should be OK it does not matter what physical sectors get written to because the data is encrypted. I think that if you encrypt your SSD's partition once (i.e. SSD's wear leveling, which will write data from any partition all over the physical blocks of the SSD, complicates matters. MBR or GPT), and that data is mostly static and mostly useless for an attacker. That is because the sole exposed data is the partion layout (e.g. My guess for a non-SSD is that you lose little security by merely encrypting a partition instead of FDE. Wherever you see "WP", please replace that with "https:/" and you should have the URL.) (Sorry, all future links will have to look like the last one above, instead of being easy reading hyperlinks, because I lack enough of a reputation on this particular stack exchange site to have more than 2 hyperlinks in a post. So, I am asking if encrypted partitions are similarly vulnerable to information leakage, or have some other kind of vulnerability that FDE would stop.Īnd, would your answer change if the drive is an SSD? An SSD will surely have wear leveling, so data is actually written throughout the drive's physical sectors (see: WP//questions/635145/possibility-of-data-loss-due-to-encryption-on-a-flash-disk). Citations: this VeraCrypt documentation page and Palancar's first response in this discussion. For example, a VeraCrypt encrypted file container volume on an unencrypted drive with an NTFS file system will, at a minimum, leak meta data. My concern arises because using an encrypted file container for a volume can be problematic. Do I lose security by merely encrypting a partition of a drive instead of doing full drive encryption (FDE)?